10 Must-Read Examples of Scripts in Psychology – A Comprehensive Guide




In the field of psychology, scripts play a crucial role in understanding human behavior and cognition. These scripts, also known as mental frameworks or cognitive maps, shape our thoughts, actions, and perceptions. This blog post aims to explore the concept of scripts in psychology and provide 10 noteworthy examples to illustrate their influence. By delving into these examples, we can gain a deeper understanding of the power and significance of scripts in shaping our lives.

Definition and Explanation of Scripts in Psychology

Scripts, in psychology, refer to the learned patterns of behavior that guide individuals’ actions and interactions based on their social and cultural experiences. They are like internal scripts or narratives that have developed over time within an individual’s mind.

These scripts are formed through a process of socialization and learning. As individuals observe and experience various situations, their brains internalize the patterns of behavior, expectations, and responses associated with those contexts. These internalized scripts then serve as guides for future behavior.

The role of scripts in shaping behavior and cognition is profound. They determine how individuals interpret and respond to social situations, influencing their perceptions, emotions, decisions, and actions. By understanding the formation and impact of scripts, we can gain valuable insights into human behavior.

Example 1: The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971, provides a striking example of how scripts can shape behavior within the context of social roles and expectations.

In this experiment, participants were randomly assigned to play the roles of prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment. It didn’t take long for the participants to fully internalize their roles and adopt the associated scripts.

The script developed by the participants who played the role of guards included exhibiting authoritarian behavior, asserting dominance, and enforcing strict rule compliance. On the other hand, the prisoners adopted a submissive script, accepting their status and experiencing psychological distress.

The impact of these scripts on behavior was astonishing. The guards became increasingly abusive, while the prisoners became increasingly passive and compliant. This experiment highlights how the adoption of specific scripts can lead to the amplification of certain behaviors and the erosion of individual autonomy and moral judgment.

Example 2: The Milgram Experiment

The Milgram Experiment, conducted by Stanley Milgram in 1961, sheds light on how scripts can influence obedience and the exercise of authority in social situations.

In this experiment, participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to a confederate (someone pretending to be a participant) every time they answered a question incorrectly. The shocks, however, were not real, but the participants were led to believe they were.

While the participants hesitated initially, the authority figure in the experiment insisted they continue, reinforcing the script that obedience to authority is paramount. The majority of the participants complied, shocking the confederate despite their obvious distress.

This experiment demonstrates how the script of unquestioning obedience to authority can override personal beliefs and ethical considerations, leading individuals to engage in harmful behavior they would not have otherwise chosen.

Example 3: The Asch Conformity Experiment

The Asch Conformity Experiment, conducted by Solomon Asch in the 1950s, explores how scripts for conformity can impact group behavior.

In this experiment, participants were shown a line segment and asked to identify which of three comparison lines matched the length of the original line. However, all but one of the participants were confederates instructed to give incorrect answers.

Under the pressure of group consensus, many participants conformed to the incorrect script, even when the correct answer was evident. This conformity occurred because the individuals did not want to be seen as deviating from the group or holding a dissenting opinion.

The Asch Conformity Experiment highlights how the strong desire for social acceptance and adherence to group norms can lead individuals to adopt and follow scripts that may contradict their own perceptions or judgments.

Example 4: The Little Albert Experiment

The Little Albert Experiment, conducted by John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner in 1920, demonstrates the long-term impact of scripts on fear conditioning and emotional responses.

In this experiment, a baby named Albert was conditioned to fear a white rat by pairing its presentation with a loud noise that elicited a fear response. Eventually, Albert developed a script associating the rat with fear, and this fear response generalized to other similar objects and animals.

This case reveals how scripts formed through classical conditioning can have lasting effects on emotional responses and guide behavior in future encounters with stimuli associated with the initial conditioning event.

Example 5: The Stanford Marshmallow Experiment

The Stanford Marshmallow Experiment, conducted by Walter Mischel in the late 1960s, provides insights into how scripts developed during childhood can influence delayed gratification and self-control.

In this experiment, children were offered a choice between a small immediate reward (one marshmallow) or a larger reward (two marshmallows) if they could delay gratification for a specified period. The researchers observed the strategies children used to resist temptation, which reflected the scripts they had internalized.

Some children were able to delay gratification by distracting themselves or adopting cognitive strategies to resist the temptation, while others succumbed to immediate gratification. This experiment highlights how individual scripts and strategies for self-control can shape the choices and behaviors individuals exhibit later in life.

Example 6: The Bobo Doll Experiment

The Bobo Doll Experiment, conducted by Albert Bandura in 1961, explores the impact of observing aggressive behavior on the development of aggressive scripts and imitative behavior in children.

In this experiment, children observed an adult model engaging in aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll. Later, the children were provided with the opportunity to interact with the doll. Those who witnessed the aggressive behavior were more likely to display similar aggressive behavior towards the doll.

This experiment suggests that the observation of aggressive models can form aggressive scripts within individuals, which may later be expressed through imitative behavior. It highlights the role of observational learning in the development and reinforcement of behaviors influenced by scripts.

Example 7: The Pygmalion Effect

The Pygmalion Effect, studied by Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson in 1968, demonstrates how scripts and self-fulfilling prophecies can shape performance and expectations.

In this experiment, students in a school were randomly assigned to two groups, with one group labeled as having high potential and the other as having low potential. However, these labels were entirely arbitrary.

Teachers were led to believe that students in the high-potential group were intellectually gifted. Consequently, they treated these students differently and had higher expectations for their abilities. As a result, these students performed significantly better than those in the low-potential group.

This experiment reveals the power of scripts and expectations in influencing individual performance and highlights the importance of recognizing and challenging biased scripts and stereotypes that can have detrimental effects on individuals.

Example 8: The Halo Effect

The Halo Effect is a cognitive bias where an initial positive impression of a person influences subsequent judgments and decisions. This script developed based on initial impressions can significantly impact perceptions and evaluations.

For example, if someone is perceived as physically attractive, they may be attributed with positive qualities and abilities unrelated to their appearance. This script can then guide how they are viewed in various contexts and may even affect opportunities or treatment they receive.

The Halo Effect demonstrates how scripts based on limited information can influence subsequent judgments, leading to biased perceptions and decisions.

Example 9: The Anchoring Bias

The Anchoring Bias is a cognitive bias where individuals rely heavily on the first piece of information (the anchor) they receive when making judgments or decisions.

Once anchored to this initial information, subsequent judgments tend to be insufficiently adjusted based on new information. This script formed by the anchor can limit the range of possibilities considered and influence final decisions or estimations.

Anchoring bias has been observed in various contexts, including negotiations, pricing, and judgment of probabilities. It demonstrates how the formation of a script based on an initial reference point can greatly impact subsequent thoughts and choices.

Example 10: The Placebo Effect

The Placebo Effect is a phenomenon in which a person experiences improvements in symptoms or conditions after receiving a treatment that is pharmacologically inert or lacks an active component.

This effect is believed to arise from the script developed through expectations, beliefs, and the therapeutic context surrounding the treatment. The placebo script can activate the brain’s natural healing mechanisms, leading to perceptible improvements in subjective experiences.

The placebo effect sheds light on how the power of the mind and the scripts we develop can influence our well-being and perception of treatment effectiveness.


Scripts play a crucial role in psychology, shaping our behavior, cognition, and perceptions. Each of the 10 examples discussed in this blog post highlights the influence of scripts in various psychological contexts.

By exploring these examples, we gain valuable insights into the power of scripts and the importance of understanding their formation, impact, and potential for both positive and negative consequences.

As we continue to uncover the intricacies of scripts in psychology, it is essential to challenge and critically evaluate the scripts we internalize to ensure that they align with our values, promote understanding, and foster healthy behaviors.

To further deepen your understanding of scripts in psychology, we encourage you to explore the vast research available on this fascinating subject.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *