Shutterstock versus Getty Images
Shutterstock, launched in 2003, focuses on stock photography and video, catering to creatives, marketers, and businesses seeking affordable, high-quality content. Getty Images, established in 1995, offers a premium collection of images, often favored by media and advertising firms. Both platforms provide extensive libraries, but differ in pricing models and audience targeting.
Shutterstock
Ideal For
Creating high-quality marketing materials
Designing visually compelling websites
Producing engaging social media content
Crafting presentations that stand out
Key Strengths
Access to a vast library of images
High-quality and diverse content
User-friendly tools for design
Core Features
Access to over 450 million stock images
Intuitive design tools for easy content creation
Flexible licensing options for different needs
Advanced search filters to find assets quickly
AI-driven features for personalized recommendations
Getty Images
Ideal For
Creating marketing materials
Illustrating articles and blog posts
Designing websites and applications
Generating social media content
Key Strengths
Access to a vast library of visuals
High-resolution image quality
Flexible licensing options
Core Features
Extensive collection of royalty-free images
High-quality vectors and illustrations
User-friendly search functionality
Simple licensing process
Regular updates with new content
Popularity
Decision Matrix
| Factor | Shutterstock | Getty Images |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Features |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Interface Design |
|
|
| Learning Curve |
|
|
| Customization Options |
|
|
Quick Decision Guide
- Vast library of high-quality images and videos
- Easy-to-use interface for quick searches
- Flexible pricing plans for various needs
- Exclusive content from top creators worldwide
- Seamless integration with design software
- You want high-quality, diverse visual content.
- You aim for extensive licensing options for various uses.
- You value a user-friendly interface for easy browsing.
- You look for curated collections to inspire creativity.
- You appreciate advanced search tools to find perfect images.
What Our Experts Say
Shutterstock excels in affordability and a vast library, making it ideal for small businesses and quick projects. Conversely, Getty Images offers high-quality, exclusive content suited for premium marketing needs. For stock footage, Shutterstock provides a wider selection, while Getty's editorial images shine in news contexts. Both face challenges in licensing complexities, but Shutterstock simplifies pricing. Ultimately, choose based on budget and quality requirements.
Jamie Davis
Software Analyst
At a Glance
Shutterstock offers a broader selection of affordable images, ideal for small businesses and social media, while Getty Images excels in high-quality editorial content and exclusive collections, best for professional and high-budget projects. Pros for Shutterstock: vast library, cost-effective. Cons: lower quality. Pros for Getty: premium quality, and diverse media. Cons: expensive. For budget-focused users, choose Shutterstock; for high-end needs, opt for Getty Images.
Pricing and Subscription Plans
Shutterstock offers flexible plans starting at $29 per month for 10 images and scales up with higher-tier subscriptions for additional downloads and features. Getty Images charges per image, with prices ranging from $150 for standard licenses to $500+ for premium content. Both platforms offer custom enterprise solutions. For small businesses, Shutterstock may provide better cost-effectiveness, while Getty suits larger entities needing high-quality exclusivity.
Performance Metrics
Shutterstock excels in speed, providing faster image searches due to its vast database and optimized algorithms. Getty Images, however, offers higher accuracy and reliability, especially for editorial content. In scenarios requiring rapid stock sourcing, Shutterstock outperforms, while Getty is preferable for precise, high-quality image needs in professional contexts.
User Experience
Shutterstock offers a modern, visually appealing interface with intuitive navigation, making it easy for users to find and filter images. Customization options are limited but effective. The learning curve is minimal due to straightforward designs. Conversely, Getty Images provides a classic interface with a more extensive library, which may feel cluttered. Its navigation can be complex, but it offers rich customizability. Learning time is slightly longer, yet they provide robust user support and resources.
Integrations and Compatibility
Shutterstock integrates with tools like Adobe Creative Cloud, Microsoft Office, and Slack, enhancing workflow efficiency. Getty Images supports API access, Adobe integration, and collaboration tools like Dropbox. Both facilitate seamless third-party app integration for creative professionals.
Limitations and Drawbacks
Shutterstock's limitations include lower image exclusivity and search relevancy, while Getty Images has higher costs and limited subscription plans. Common shortcomings are licensing complexities. Workarounds: use filters for search optimization and compare pricing options.